On 05/17/12 10:59, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Are you still working on this for GCC 4.8?
Not actively.
r~
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Seeing as how Uros is starting to go down the path of cleaning up the
> flags handling for x86, I thought I'd go ahead and knock up the idea
> that I've been tossing around to help automate the process of building
> patterns that match bo
On 02/22/12 17:16, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> What I know is missing off the top of my head are:
>
>> (2) Can't be usefully used with define_insn_and_split, and no way to tell.
>> This problem should simply be documented in the .texi file as user
>> error.
>
> Not sure I see the problem
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Seeing as how Uros is starting to go down the path of cleaning up the
> flags handling for x86, I thought I'd go ahead and knock up the idea
> that I've been tossing around to help automate the process of building
> patterns that match both clobbering
On 02/14/2012 12:52 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Other than that: To convert a port, there is still a lot of work to be
done to define and handle the various CC modes properly (well, not for
the pdp11, because it writes out >1 insn for most define_insns), but
it is great not having to define all th
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Seeing as how Uros is starting to go down the path of cleaning up the
> flags handling for x86, I thought I'd go ahead and knock up the idea
> that I've been tossing around to help automate the process of building
> patterns that match bo
