On 10/26/2016 01:34 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jeff Law wrote:
First, there's a missing fallthru comment in spu_sched_reorder for
TYPE_LOAD/TYPE_STORE cases. If I'm reading the SPU docs properly a
load/store insn is handled by pipe_1 and we're also trying to model some
aspects of the load-store
Jeff Law wrote:
> First, there's a missing fallthru comment in spu_sched_reorder for
> TYPE_LOAD/TYPE_STORE cases. If I'm reading the SPU docs properly a
> load/store insn is handled by pipe_1 and we're also trying to model some
> aspects of the load-store unit. So we should be setting pipe_l