Re: [RFA] Patch to allow SPU port to build with current trunk

2016-10-26 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/26/2016 01:34 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: Jeff Law wrote: First, there's a missing fallthru comment in spu_sched_reorder for TYPE_LOAD/TYPE_STORE cases. If I'm reading the SPU docs properly a load/store insn is handled by pipe_1 and we're also trying to model some aspects of the load-store

Re: [RFA] Patch to allow SPU port to build with current trunk

2016-10-26 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Jeff Law wrote: > First, there's a missing fallthru comment in spu_sched_reorder for > TYPE_LOAD/TYPE_STORE cases. If I'm reading the SPU docs properly a > load/store insn is handled by pipe_1 and we're also trying to model some > aspects of the load-store unit. So we should be setting pipe_l