On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 06/12/16 12:49 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 06/12/16 03:52 -0800, Tim Shen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This looks good - OK for trunk, thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>> Committed.
>>>
>>> Th
On 06/12/16 12:49 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 06/12/16 03:52 -0800, Tim Shen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This looks good - OK for trunk, thanks!
Committed.
Thanks!
ChangeLog dates fixed by this patch.
And pretty printer fixed by this one.
The "vref
On 06/12/16 03:52 -0800, Tim Shen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This looks good - OK for trunk, thanks!
Committed.
Thanks!
ChangeLog dates fixed by this patch.
commit c3651cf0403b826414b8376bb29b4757530f4eec
Author: redi
Date: Tue Dec 6 12:48:54 2016 +000
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This looks good - OK for trunk, thanks!
Committed.
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Tim Shen
On 02/12/16 19:14 -0800, Tim Shen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/11/16 21:38 -0800, Tim Shen wrote:
This 4-patch series contains the following in order:
a.diff: Remove uses-allocator ctors. They are going away, and removing
it reduces the maintenance burd
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 26/11/16 21:38 -0800, Tim Shen wrote:
>>
>> This 4-patch series contains the following in order:
>>
>> a.diff: Remove uses-allocator ctors. They are going away, and removing
>> it reduces the maintenance burden from now on.
>
>
> Yay! les
On 30/11/16 19:29 -0800, Tim Shen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/11/16 21:38 -0800, Tim Shen wrote:
+ template>
struct _Uninitialized;
I'm still unsure that is_literal_type is the right trait here. If it's
definitely right then we should probably *n
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 26/11/16 21:38 -0800, Tim Shen wrote:
>> + template>
>> struct _Uninitialized;
>
>
> I'm still unsure that is_literal_type is the right trait here. If it's
> definitely right then we should probably *not* deprecate it in C++17!
No i
On 26/11/16 21:38 -0800, Tim Shen wrote:
This 4-patch series contains the following in order:
a.diff: Remove uses-allocator ctors. They are going away, and removing
it reduces the maintenance burden from now on.
Yay! less code.
b.diff: Add constexpr support for get<> and comparisons. This pa
