On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > and "Update text." is thoroughly unhelpful as a ChangeLog entry to
> > explain the intent of the changes.
>
> Well, indeed, but ChangeLog entries have always been a
> thoroughly unhelpful "what changed" rather than "why did it
> change". (grep ": U
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 02:56:58PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, James Greenhalgh wrote:
I was aiming to:
* Remove outdated details of the compiler.
* Remove long or obscure words that, while accurate, only served to
obfusc
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 02:56:58PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> > I was aiming to:
> >
> > * Remove outdated details of the compiler.
> > * Remove long or obscure words that, while accurate, only served to
> > obfuscate a simple idea.
> >
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> I was aiming to:
>
> * Remove outdated details of the compiler.
> * Remove long or obscure words that, while accurate, only served to
> obfuscate a simple idea.
> * Refer to similar things in a consistent fashion - in particular
> trying
