Re: [Patch Vax] zero/sign extend patterns need to be SUBREG aware

2015-06-29 Thread Matt Thomas
> On Jun 29, 2015, at 8:19 AM, James Greenhalgh > wrote: > > Now that this has had a few days sitting on trunk without seeing any > complaints, would you mind if I backported it to the GCC 5 branch? I don’t have a problem with that.

Re: [Patch Vax] zero/sign extend patterns need to be SUBREG aware

2015-06-29 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 05:30:21PM +0100, Matt Thomas wrote: > > > On Jun 19, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > > > Hi James, > > > > On Tue, 2015-06-16 10:58:48 +0100, James Greenhalgh > > wrote: > >> The testcase in this patch, from libgcc, causes an ICE in the Vax > >> build.

Re: [Patch Vax] zero/sign extend patterns need to be SUBREG aware

2015-06-19 Thread Matt Thomas
> On Jun 19, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > Hi James, > > On Tue, 2015-06-16 10:58:48 +0100, James Greenhalgh > wrote: >> The testcase in this patch, from libgcc, causes an ICE in the Vax >> build. > [...] >> As far as I know, reload is going to get rid of these SUBREGs >> for