On 17 May 2016 at 12:02, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
>> On 17 May 2016 at 10:06, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is just a simplification, it probably makes life easier for register
>> > allocation in some corner
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> On 17 May 2016 at 10:06, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is just a simplification, it probably makes life easier for register
> > allocation in some corner cases and seems the right thing to do. We don't
> > use t
On 17 May 2016 at 10:06, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is just a simplification, it probably makes life easier for register
> allocation in some corner cases and seems the right thing to do. We don't
> use the internal version elsewhere, so we're safe to delete it and change
> the types
