On 20 January 2014 17:33, Alex Velenko wrote:
> Can someone, please, commit this patch, as I do not have permissions?
> Kind regards,
> Alex
Committed.
/Marcus
On 20/01/14 11:16, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 20/01/14 11:15, Alex Velenko wrote:
On 17/01/14 15:55, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:43, Alex Velenko wrote:
On 14/01/14 15:51, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
Hi,
This patch turns off the v
On 20/01/14 11:15, Alex Velenko wrote:
> On 17/01/14 15:55, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 16/01/14 14:43, Alex Velenko wrote:
>>> On 14/01/14 15:51, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch turns off the vec_pe
On 17/01/14 15:55, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:43, Alex Velenko wrote:
On 14/01/14 15:51, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
Hi,
This patch turns off the vec_perm patterns for aarch64_be, this should resolve
the issue highlighted here
ht
On 16/01/14 14:43, Alex Velenko wrote:
> On 14/01/14 15:51, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch turns off the vec_perm patterns for aarch64_be, this should
>>> resolve
>>> the issue highlighted here
>>> http://gcc.gn
On 14/01/14 15:51, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
Hi,
This patch turns off the vec_perm patterns for aarch64_be, this should resolve
the issue highlighted here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00321.html
With this patch applied, the t
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch turns off the vec_perm patterns for aarch64_be, this should resolve
> the issue highlighted here
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00321.html
> With this patch applied, the test case provided in that link
Hi,
This patch turns off the vec_perm patterns for aarch64_be, this should
resolve
the issue highlighted here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00321.html
With this patch applied, the test case provided in that link compiles
without an ICE.
However, the Big-Endian port is still i
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 12:10:13AM +, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Marcus Shawcroft
> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew, We know that there are numerous issues with aarch64 BE advsimd
> > support in GCC. The aarch64_be support is very much a work in progress.
> > Tejas sorted
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Marcus Shawcroft
wrote:
>
> On 7 Jan 2014, at 23:10, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:31 AM, James Greenhalgh
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for Vector Shuffle style operations
>>> through support for TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_P
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:31 AM, James Greenhalgh
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds support for Vector Shuffle style operations
> through support for TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_PERM_CONST_OK and
> the vec_perm and vec_perm_const standard patterns.
>
> In this patch we add the framework and support for t
> OK
>
> /Marcus
Thanks Marcus,
I've committed this and the follow-up patch to trunk and
back-ported them to AArch64-4.7-branch.
The back-port required back-porting the attached patch,
which fixes up the expected behaviour of
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-8.c.
After committing this as a p
OK
/Marcus
On 4 December 2012 10:31, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds support for Vector Shuffle style operations
> through support for TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_PERM_CONST_OK and
> the vec_perm and vec_perm_const standard patterns.
>
> In this patch we add the framework and suppor
13 matches
Mail list logo
