Re: [Patch] openmp: Map holds clause to IFN_ASSUME for Fortran

2022-10-06 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 06:15:52PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > On 06.10.22 14:17, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 12:55:01PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > > > I don't know whether it makes sense to handle – in the long run – the > > > case of se.pre/se.post being nonempty – and,

Re: [Patch] openmp: Map holds clause to IFN_ASSUME for Fortran

2022-10-06 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 06.10.22 14:17, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 12:55:01PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: I don't know whether it makes sense to handle – in the long run – the case of se.pre/se.post being nonempty – and, if so, how. I think it is essential not to throw those away, if se.pre or se.

Re: [Patch] openmp: Map holds clause to IFN_ASSUME for Fortran

2022-10-06 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 12:55:01PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Same as for C/C++, albeit a tiny bit longer patch. > > I don't know whether it makes sense to handle – in the long run – the > case of se.pre/se.post being nonempty – and, if so, how. I think it is essential not to throw those away,