Re: [Patch] invoke.texi: Add note that -foffload= does not affect device detection

2024-03-04 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi Sandra, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 3/1/24 08:23, Tobias Burnus wrote: Maybe the proposed wording will help others to avoid this pitfall. (Or is this superfluous as -foffload= is not much used and, even if, no one then remembers or finds this none?) Well, I spent a long time looking at this

Re: [Patch] invoke.texi: Add note that -foffload= does not affect device detection

2024-03-04 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 3/1/24 17:29, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 3/1/24 08:23, Tobias Burnus wrote: Aside: Shouldn't all the HTML documents start with a and before the table of content? Currently, it has:    Top (GNU libgomp) and the body starts with    Short Table of Contents I no

Re: [Patch] invoke.texi: Add note that -foffload= does not affect device detection

2024-03-03 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 3/1/24 17:29, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 3/1/24 08:23, Tobias Burnus wrote: Aside: Shouldn't all the HTML documents start with a and before the table of content? Currently, it has:    Top (GNU libgomp) and the body starts with    Short Table of Contents I think this is a bug in the versi

Re: [Patch] invoke.texi: Add note that -foffload= does not affect device detection

2024-03-01 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 3/1/24 08:23, Tobias Burnus wrote: Not very often, but do I keep running into issues (fails, segfaults) related to testing programs compiled with a GCC without offload configured and then using the system libraries. - That's equivalent to having the system compiler (or any offload compiler) an