On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 10:25:42AM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Revert "libstdc++: Use GLIBCXX_CHECK_LINKER_FEATURES for cross-builds
> (PR111238)"
>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
> index 8f7b01e0563..0c60149d7f6 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
> +++ b
On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 11:45, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 10:20:19AM +0200, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Sept 2023 at 16:38, Tobias Burnus
> wrote:
> >
> > > That's based on the fail
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gccadmin/2023q3/020349.html
> >
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 10:20:19AM +0200, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Sept 2023 at 16:38, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> > That's based on the fail
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gccadmin/2023q3/020349.html
> > and on the discussion on IRC.
> >
>
> Sorry I didn't notice the p
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 11:30:53AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> contrib/gcc-changelog: Check whether revert-commit exists
>
> contrib/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc-changelog/git_commit.py (GitCommit.__init__):
> Handle commit_to_info_hook = None; otherwise, if None,
> regard it as error
First: Hi all,
attached is an updated patch (v3) where I changed the wording
of the warning to distinguish technical reasons for not using
the commit data (→ git_email.py) from not-found lookups (git_check_commit.py)
to avoid confusion. (See also below.)
Any remarks/suggestions - related to this
Hi!
On Tue, 5 Sept 2023 at 16:38, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> That's based on the fail
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gccadmin/2023q3/020349.html
> and on the discussion on IRC.
>
Sorry I didn't notice the problem, nor the discussion on IRC, but I can see
that my commits created the problem, sorry
Tobias Burnus writes:
> Attached an old patch. See attached patch for the current one.
>
> Difference is one line: the warning that is shown in the example output
> below.
Python-wise, the changes seem fine. Unsure if it does the right thing,
though, since I'm not familiar with the full script
Attached an old patch. See attached patch for the current one.
Difference is one line: the warning that is shown in the example output
below.
On 05.09.23 16:37, Tobias Burnus wrote:
That's based on the fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gccadmin/2023q3/020349.html
and on the discussion on IRC.
