Hello!
>> +2012-10-09 Venkataramanan Kumar
>> +
>> +PR testsuite/53397
>> +* gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: Remove test cases pr53397-1.c and pr53397-2.c
>> +they are moved to gcc.target/i386 as they are specific to i386/x86_64.
>> +* gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr53397-1.c: New test
>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 09:48:02AM +, Kumar, Venkataramanan wrote:
> +2012-10-09 Venkataramanan Kumar
> +
> + PR testsuite/53397
> + * gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: Remove test cases pr53397-1.c and pr53397-2.c
> + they are moved to gcc.target/i386 as they are specific to i386/x86_64.
>
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:06 PM
To: Kumar, Venkataramanan
Cc: Richard Guenther; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix PR53397
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:01:53AM +, Kumar, Venkataramanan wrote:
Both the testcases fail on i686-linux unfortunately:
Excess errors:
/usr/src/gcc/gcc
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:01:53AM +, Kumar, Venkataramanan wrote:
Both the testcases fail on i686-linux unfortunately:
Excess errors:
/usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr53397-1.c:1:0: warning:
-fprefetch-loop-arrays not supported for this target (try -march switches)
[enabled by defau
heck -k" passes with x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
I presume also bootstrapped.
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Regards,
> Venkat.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 6:26 PM
> To: Kumar, Venkata
richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 6:26 PM
To: Kumar, Venkataramanan
Cc: Richard Guenther; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix PR53397
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Kumar, Venkataramanan
wrote:
> Hi Richi,
>
> (Snip)
>> + (!cst_and_fits_
e place?
Yes, call dump_mem_ref then, instead of repeating parts of its body.
Richard.
> Regards,
> Venkat.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Richard Guenther [mailto:rguent...@suse.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 5:42 PM
> To: Kumar, Venkataramanan
> C
ences.
so I thought of dumping the references here.
Is there a cleaner way to dump the references at one place?
Regards,
Venkat.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Guenther [mailto:rguent...@suse.de]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 5:42 PM
To: Kumar, Venkataramanan
Cc: gcc-patches
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, venkataramanan.ku...@amd.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The below patch fixes the FFT/Scimark regression caused by useless prefetch
> generation.
>
> This fix tries to make prefetch less aggressive by prefetching arrays in the
> inner loop, when the step is invariant in the entire loo
