2012/6/25 Tristan Gingold :
>
> On Jun 18, 2012, at 4:28 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>
>> Hello Tristan,
>>
>> patch works for me, too. Just one nit about the patch.
>>
>> 2012/6/18 Tristan Gingold :
>>> @@ -8558,6 +8558,11 @@ ix86_frame_pointer_required (void)
>>> if (TARGET_32BIT_MS_ABI && cfun->calls
On Jun 18, 2012, at 4:28 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hello Tristan,
>
> patch works for me, too. Just one nit about the patch.
>
> 2012/6/18 Tristan Gingold :
>> @@ -8558,6 +8558,11 @@ ix86_frame_pointer_required (void)
>> if (TARGET_32BIT_MS_ABI && cfun->calls_setjmp)
>> return true;
>>
>> +
On Jun 19, 2012, at 6:47 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-06-18 05:22, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> +/* Output assembly code to get the establisher frame (Windows x64 only).
>> + This corresponds to what will be computed by Windows from Frame Register
>> + and Frame Register Offset fields
On Jun 19, 2012, at 6:47 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-06-18 05:22, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> + /* Win64 SEH, very large frames need a frame-pointer as maximum stack
>> + allocation is 4GB (add a safety guard for saved registers). */
>> + if (TARGET_64BIT_MS_ABI && get_frame_size
On 2012-06-18 05:22, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> + /* Win64 SEH, very large frames need a frame-pointer as maximum stack
> + allocation is 4GB (add a safety guard for saved registers). */
> + if (TARGET_64BIT_MS_ABI && get_frame_size () + 4096 > SEH_MAX_FRAME_SIZE)
> +return true;
Elsewher
On Jun 18, 2012, at 4:28 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hello Tristan,
>
> patch works for me, too. Just one nit about the patch.
>
> 2012/6/18 Tristan Gingold :
>> @@ -8558,6 +8558,11 @@ ix86_frame_pointer_required (void)
>> if (TARGET_32BIT_MS_ABI && cfun->calls_setjmp)
>> return true;
>>
>> +
Hello Tristan,
patch works for me, too. Just one nit about the patch.
2012/6/18 Tristan Gingold :
> @@ -8558,6 +8558,11 @@ ix86_frame_pointer_required (void)
> if (TARGET_32BIT_MS_ABI && cfun->calls_setjmp)
> return true;
>
> + /* Win64 SEH, very large frames need a frame-pointer as maximu
