Hi,
Sorry to bother people again. Is this OK to go now?
Thanks!
David.
> >
> > > On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, David Sherwood wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have added new STRICT_MAX_EXPR and STRICT_MIN_EXPR expressions to
> > > > support the
> > > > IEEE versions of fmin and fmax. This is d
Hi,
Sorry to bother people again. Is this OK to go now?
Thanks!
David.
-Original Message-
From: David Sherwood [mailto:david.sherw...@arm.com]
Sent: 15 July 2015 11:29
To: 'Joseph Myers'
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [Patch] Add support for IEEE-conformant versions
> >
> > > On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, David Sherwood wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have added new STRICT_MAX_EXPR and STRICT_MIN_EXPR expressions to
> > > > support the
> > > > IEEE versions of fmin and fmax. This is done by recognising the math
> > > > library
> > > > "fmax" and "fmin" bui
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, David Sherwood wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, David Sherwood wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have added new STRICT_MAX_EXPR and STRICT_MIN_EXPR expressions to
> > > support the
> > > IEEE versions of fmin and fmax. This is done by recognising the math
> > > library
>
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, David Sherwood wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have added new STRICT_MAX_EXPR and STRICT_MIN_EXPR expressions to support
> > the
> > IEEE versions of fmin and fmax. This is done by recognising the math library
> > "fmax" and "fmin" builtin functions in a similar way to how this
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, David Sherwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have added new STRICT_MAX_EXPR and STRICT_MIN_EXPR expressions to support
> the
> IEEE versions of fmin and fmax. This is done by recognising the math library
> "fmax" and "fmin" builtin functions in a similar way to how this is done for
> -
