Weddington, Eric schrieb:
Hi Johann,
Can we hold off on this patch for just a little bit? I agree it would
be good to clean it up, but I would like to get in the attached patch
to add some builtin functions that Anatoly and I worked on. The patch
was (nominally) for 4.4. I need to see if it wil
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 10:24 AM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: Georg-Johann Lay; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Denis Chertykov; Anatoly
> Sokolov; Joerg Wunsch
> Subject: Re: [Patch][AVR]: Us
> +;; SWAP
> +(define_insn "swap"
> + [(set (match_operand:QI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> + (unspec:QI [(match_operand:QI 1 "register_operand" "0")]
> +UNSPEC_SWAP))]
> + ""
> + "swap %0"
> + [(set_attr "length" "1")
> + (set_attr "cc" "none")])
This is already properly
> -Original Message-
> From: Georg-Johann Lay [mailto:a...@gjlay.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 9:10 AM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Denis Chertykov; Anatoly Sokolov; Joerg
> Wunsch
> Subject: Re: [Patch][AVR]: Use define_c_enum wher
Weddington, Eric schrieb:
>
>> -Original Message- From: Georg-Johann Lay
>> [mailto:a...@gjlay.de] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 8:45 AM To:
>> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Denis Chertykov; Anatoly Sokolov;
>> Weddington, Eric Subject: [Patch][AVR]: Use define_c_enum where
>> appropriate
> -Original Message-
> From: Georg-Johann Lay [mailto:a...@gjlay.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 8:45 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Denis Chertykov; Anatoly Sokolov; Weddington, Eric
> Subject: [Patch][AVR]: Use define_c_enum where appropriate
>
> Use define_c_enum instead
