James Greenhalgh writes:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:40:22PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch requires int32plus for
>> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c, as it reports a bunch of
>> failures for a 16 bit int target like the avr. The "%u" format
>> spe
On 09/27/2016 03:41 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Sep 27, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/27/2016 10:39 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:40:22PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
Hi,
This patch requires int32plus for
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c, a
On Sep 27, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 09/27/2016 10:39 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:40:22PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch requires int32plus for
>>> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c, as it reports a bunch of
On 27 September 2016 at 20:38, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/27/2016 10:39 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:40:22PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch requires int32plus for
>>> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c, as it reports a bun
On 09/27/2016 10:39 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:40:22PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
Hi,
This patch requires int32plus for
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c, as it reports a bunch of
failures for a 16 bit int target like the avr. The "%u" format
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:40:22PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch requires int32plus for
> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c, as it reports a bunch of
> failures for a 16 bit int target like the avr. The "%u" format
> specifier tests, for example, use int