Re: [Patch, i386] Separate Intel processor with expanded ISA

2014-01-27 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > +2013-12-29 Allan Sandfeld Jensen > > Missing space in ChangeLog entry. > > + * config/i386/i386.c (get_builtin_code_for_version): Separate > + Westmere from Nehalem, Ivy Bridge from Sandy Bridge and > + Broadwell from Haswell. > > --- a/g

Re: [Patch, i386] Separate Intel processor with expanded ISA

2014-01-27 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! +2013-12-29 Allan Sandfeld Jensen Missing space in ChangeLog entry. + * config/i386/i386.c (get_builtin_code_for_version): Separate + Westmere from Nehalem, Ivy Bridge from Sandy Bridge and + Broadwell from Haswell. --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c @@ -31298,1

Re: [Patch, i386] Separate Intel processor with expanded ISA

2014-01-26 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
Updated patch with test. diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index ccbea0f..e80c30b 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2013-12-29 Allan Sandfeld Jensen + * config/i386/i386.c (get_builtin_code_for_version): Separate + Westmere from Nehalem, Ivy Bridge from San

Re: [Patch, i386] Separate Intel processor with expanded ISA

2014-01-08 Thread Kirill Yukhin
Hello Allan, On 07 Jan 20:54, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Sunday 29 December 2013, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > The function dispatcher might currently choose functions declared with > > target("arch=ivybridge") on a Sandy Bridge CPU. This happens because the > > function is only detected

Re: [Patch, i386] Separate Intel processor with expanded ISA

2014-01-07 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
No comments? On Sunday 29 December 2013, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > The function dispatcher might currently choose functions declared with > target("arch=ivybridge") on a Sandy Bridge CPU. This happens because the > function is only detected as sandybridge when generated. The attached patch >