It's 46991 of course.
Many thanks
Paul
On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 17:15, Paul Richard Thomas <
paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Blast! Thanks for pointing it out. The testcase is in a directory
> ~/prs/pr46691, which I then took from the editor. Original sin and all
> that.
>
> Paul
>
>
Blast! Thanks for pointing it out. The testcase is in a directory
~/prs/pr46691, which I then took from the editor. Original sin and all
that.
Paul
On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 17:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> PR 46691 is the wrong PR number:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46691
>
PR 46691 is the wrong PR number:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46691
The comment in the testcase is wrong, and the ChangeLog file will get
auto-updated with the wrong number overnight (you can manually edit it
and push the fix tomorrow after it's been generated).
Hi Paul,
this and the Changelog LGTM at least for 12. Give it a consolidation time before
applying to 11. Having had some issues in the vicinity of the code you addressed
I am quite happy to see how easy the fix looks.
Any chances you can take a look at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/
Hi All,
Please find below a corrected ChangeLog.
Sorry that I didn't get it right first go.
Paul
Fortran: Assumed and explicit size class arrays [PR46691/99819].
2021-05-06 Paul Thomas
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
PR fortran/46691
PR fortran/99819
* class.c (gfc_build_class_symbol): Remove the e
