Re: [Patch, fortran] PR65792 unitialized structure constructor array subcomponent

2015-04-25 Thread Mikael Morin
Dominique reported that the trunk patch breaks class_19.f90 when applied together with Andre's PR59678 fix. It appears to me that even without Andre's patch, the code generated is wrong, and I don't see any easy fix. Thus I'm withdrawing trunk's patch, and propose the backport patch also for trunk.

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR65792 unitialized structure constructor array subcomponent

2015-04-20 Thread Dominique d'Humières
I have retested a clean tree with only the patches for pr 65792 [first patch] and Andre’s one for pr59678: i.e., without any patch from pr61831, and I still see the conflict between the two patches. Dominique > Le 19 avr. 2015 à 10:39, Dominique d'Humières a écrit : > >> Snip >> Both patche

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR65792 unitialized structure constructor array subcomponent

2015-04-19 Thread Dominique d'Humières
> Snip > Both patches have been regression tested on trunk on x86_64-linux. > > OK for trunk [first patch]? > OK for 4.9 and 5 (after the 5.1 release) [second patch]? > > Mikael > > PS: Dominiq reported that the variant of this patch posted on the PR was > also fixing PR49324. I couldn't confirm as