On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 08:46 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Given Alex' comments in the PR, the second hunk is definitely ok for trunk,
> the first one can be applied too (but you can skip it too if you want, it
> shouldn't make a difference).
Thanks, I checked in both chunks.
Steve Ellcey
sell..
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:58:51AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> Here is my patch to fix the bootstrap comparision failure (PR 54128) on
> MIPS. The reason for the comparision failure was a difference in
> register usage and I tracked it down to build_insn_chain which checked
> all instructions fo
Don't have time to look at this in detail, but FWIW:
Steve Ellcey writes:
> On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 08:15 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:58:51AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> > Here is my patch to fix the bootstrap comparision failure (PR 54128) on
>> > MIPS. The reason
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 08:15 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:58:51AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > Here is my patch to fix the bootstrap comparision failure (PR 54128) on
> > MIPS. The reason for the comparision failure was a difference in
> > register usage and I tracked
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 08:15 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> The debug insns generally shouldn't extend the lifetime of pseudos (see the
> valtrack.c stuff), so if you hit this, there is probably some earlier bug
> that didn't reset/adjust the debug insns in question.
> I'm not saying the ira.c patch
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:58:51AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> Here is my patch to fix the bootstrap comparision failure (PR 54128) on
> MIPS. The reason for the comparision failure was a difference in
> register usage and I tracked it down to build_insn_chain which checked
> all instructions fo
