Re: [PR debug/47624] improve value tracking in non-VTA locations

2012-06-13 Thread Richard Henderson
On 2012-06-13 01:02, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > Ping? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01320.html Ok. r~

Re: [PR debug/47624] improve value tracking in non-VTA locations

2012-06-13 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 22, 2012, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > for gcc/ChangeLog > from Alexandre Oliva > PR debug/47624 > * var-tracking.c (loc_exp_dep_pool): New. > (vt_emit_notes): Create and release the pool. > (compute_bb_dataflow): Use value-based locations in MO_VAL_SET. > (e

Re: [PR debug/47624] improve value tracking in non-VTA locations

2012-04-22 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jun 4, 2011, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 15, 2011, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> VTA only tracks locations of gimple regs, while addressable variables >> still use the old var tracking strategy. This means addressable >> variables, during var-tracking, got locations that were not based on >

Re: [PR debug/47624] improve value tracking in non-VTA locations

2011-06-04 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 15, 2011, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > VTA only tracks locations of gimple regs, while addressable variables > still use the old var tracking strategy. This means addressable > variables, during var-tracking, got locations that were not based on > VALUEs, which failed immediately in the prese