Now also to the list...
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 09 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > >> + /* If we only have the fntype extracted from the call statement,
> > >> check it
> >
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 09 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
...
>> + /* If we only have the fntype extracted from the call statement, check it
>> + against the type of declarations while being pessimistic about
>> + promotions. */
>> + tree p;
>> +
>> + if (fndecl)
>> +p = TYPE_ARG_TYPES (
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been looking at PR 70929 and at the newly reported duplicate PR
> 91988 and would like to propose the following patch to address them.
> Basically, the idea is that if the types or arguments in TYPE_ARG_TYPES
> (as opposed to DECL_ARGUMENTS)
