Re: [PATH] Intel offload library

2014-09-09 Thread Andrey Turetskiy
Ping. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Andrey Turetskiy wrote: > Ping. > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Andrey Turetskiy > wrote: >> Ping. >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin >> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> On 12 Aug 10:58, Andrey Turetskiy wrote: All remarks from htt

Re: [PATH] Intel offload library

2014-09-04 Thread Andrey Turetskiy
Ping. On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Andrey Turetskiy wrote: > Ping. > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin > wrote: >> Hello, >> On 12 Aug 10:58, Andrey Turetskiy wrote: >>> All remarks from >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02166.html are fixed. >>> Updated ver

Re: [PATH] Intel offload library

2014-08-25 Thread Andrey Turetskiy
Ping. On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote: > Hello, > On 12 Aug 10:58, Andrey Turetskiy wrote: >> All remarks from >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02166.html are fixed. >> Updated version of liboffloadmic you can find in GIT branch >> kyukhin/gomp4-offload: >> h

Re: [PATH] Intel offload library

2014-08-19 Thread Kirill Yukhin
Hello, On 12 Aug 10:58, Andrey Turetskiy wrote: > All remarks from > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02166.html are fixed. > Updated version of liboffloadmic you can find in GIT branch > kyukhin/gomp4-offload: > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kyukhin/gomp4-

Re: [PATH] Intel offload library

2014-08-12 Thread Andrey Turetskiy
All remarks from https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02166.html are fixed. Updated version of liboffloadmic you can find in GIT branch kyukhin/gomp4-offload: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kyukhin/gomp4-offload. Commit: HEAD~3 ("Add liboffloadmic with offloadin

Re: [PATH] Intel offload library

2014-07-30 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Andrey Turetskiy wrote: > > * Don't duplicate the logic for what's a hosted POSIX system; refactor it > > to a common fragment in config/ (I guess it needs to be a shell script > > fragment there rather than an actual autoconf macro, since you're using > > that logic in configu

Re: [PATH] Intel offload library

2014-07-27 Thread Andrey Turetskiy
Ping. On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Andrey Turetskiy wrote: > Ping. > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Andrey Turetskiy > wrote: >>> * Don't duplicate the logic for what's a hosted POSIX system; refactor it >>> to a common fragment in config/ (I guess it needs to be a shell script >>> fragme

Re: [PATH] Intel offload library

2014-07-21 Thread Andrey Turetskiy
Ping. On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Andrey Turetskiy wrote: >> * Don't duplicate the logic for what's a hosted POSIX system; refactor it >> to a common fragment in config/ (I guess it needs to be a shell script >> fragment there rather than an actual autoconf macro, since you're using >> that l

Re: [PATH] Intel offload library

2014-07-02 Thread Andrey Turetskiy
> * Don't duplicate the logic for what's a hosted POSIX system; refactor it > to a common fragment in config/ (I guess it needs to be a shell script > fragment there rather than an actual autoconf macro, since you're using > that logic in configure.tgt which is itself such a fragment). I've attach

Re: [PATH] Intel offload library

2014-06-26 Thread Joseph S. Myers
Some observations on this code (the first is about integration in GCC, the rest about general good practice for writing robust C libraries for use on GNU/Linux, where failure to follow such practice is likely to lead to problems and security advisories in future, so if the code goes in without