Re: [PATCH v8] add -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M option

2017-06-12 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 06/06/2017 03:49 AM, Torsten Duwe wrote: On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 08:12:49PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 05/29/2017 04:29 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi index 65308c9d933..6cbb77a8dc4 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/invok

Re: [PATCH v8] add -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M option

2017-06-06 Thread Torsten Duwe
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 08:12:49PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 05/29/2017 04:29 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > > >>diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > >>index 65308c9d933..6cbb77a8dc4 100644 > >>--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > >>+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > >>@@ -11382,6 +1138

Re: [PATCH v8] add -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M option

2017-06-04 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 05/29/2017 04:29 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi index 65308c9d933..6cbb77a8dc4 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi @@ -11382,6 +11382,32 @@ of the function name, it is considered to be a match. For C99 and C++ extend

Re: [PATCH v8] add -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M option

2017-05-29 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
Ping? Richard E., this feature will immediately benefit AArch64 backend and Linux kernel. Do you plan to review it? Thank you. On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Torsten Duwe wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 01:35:52PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> >> >> >> How about --fpatchable-func