On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 12:48:56PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> First of all, GCC is in stage4 and this isn't a fix for a regression, so it
> is not acceptable at this point. Next stage1 will start in April or so.
I had gotten the impression there were sort of branches in the SCM; this
of cou
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:01:16AM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 13/01/17 12:19, Torsten Duwe wrote:
>
> > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> > @@ -11341,6 +11341,27 @@ of the function name, it is considered to be a
> > match. For C99 and C++
> > extended identifiers, the function name m
On 15/02/17 11:12, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:01:16AM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 13/01/17 12:19, Torsten Duwe wrote:
>>> Changes since v4: hopefully addressed all of Sandra's requests
>>> and suggestions concerning the documentation snippets, thanks
>>> for
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:01:16AM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 13/01/17 12:19, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > Changes since v4: hopefully addressed all of Sandra's requests
> > and suggestions concerning the documentation snippets, thanks
> > for the feedback. If it still isn't clear, fee
On 13/01/17 12:19, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> Changes since v4: hopefully addressed all of Sandra's requests
> and suggestions concerning the documentation snippets, thanks
> for the feedback. If it still isn't clear, feel free to rephrase
> -- I'm a programmer, not a technical writer.
>
Generally, I
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 12:18:05PM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 05:25:45PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > There's still a a few details that need addressing, and some questions I
> > have. Also Ccing Jakub to have another pair of eyes on the name of the
> > section - I don'
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 05:25:45PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> There's still a a few details that need addressing, and some questions I
> have. Also Ccing Jakub to have another pair of eyes on the name of the
> section - I don't know if we want some sort of .gnu.something name.
So Jakub, Richard
There's still a a few details that need addressing, and some questions I
have. Also Ccing Jakub to have another pair of eyes on the name of the
section - I don't know if we want some sort of .gnu.something name.
On 01/13/2017 01:19 PM, Torsten Duwe wrote:
2017-01-13 Torsten Duwe :
And what's next now?
Maxim mentioned in this thread you should sort of formally approve(?)
a global feature, have you had a look at it yet?
I should emphasize that this code can substitute the -fentry for arm64 for
the purpose of kernel live patching that was discussed in the beginning,
as well a
On 01/13/2017 05:19 AM, Torsten Duwe wrote:
Changes since v4: hopefully addressed all of Sandra's requests
and suggestions concerning the documentation snippets, thanks
for the feedback. If it still isn't clear, feel free to rephrase
-- I'm a programmer, not a technical writer.
Thanks, this ma
10 matches
Mail list logo
