Re: [PATCH v5] Target-independent store forwarding avoidance.

2024-10-18 Thread Konstantinos Eleftheriou
Sent a new version for this in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-October/665794.html. Thanks, Konstantinos. On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 4:32 PM Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Manolis Tsamis writes: > >> > I could have some help with that, because after the new changes a > >> > subreg rel

Re: [PATCH v5] Target-independent store forwarding avoidance.

2024-08-30 Thread Richard Sandiford
Manolis Tsamis writes: >> > I could have some help with that, because after the new changes a >> > subreg related ICE also happens within store_bit_field when a DI -> >> > V4SI case is hit. Afaik store_bit_field should just return NULL if it >> > can't handle something so I don't really know how t

Re: [PATCH v5] Target-independent store forwarding avoidance.

2024-08-30 Thread Manolis Tsamis
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 9:16 PM Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Manolis Tsamis writes: > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 5:33 PM Richard Sandiford > > wrote: > >> Manolis Tsamis writes: > >> > +} > >> > + > >> > + virtual unsigned int execute (function *) override; > >> > +}; // class pass_rtl_avoi

Re: [PATCH v5] Target-independent store forwarding avoidance.

2024-08-29 Thread Jeff Law
On 8/29/24 12:16 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: Most passes were written while the codebase was still C. I think newer passes have generally been written in the way I described. Where possible, it'd be better for new code to avoid using globals to communicate information between functions, to

Re: [PATCH v5] Target-independent store forwarding avoidance.

2024-08-29 Thread Richard Sandiford
Manolis Tsamis writes: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 5:33 PM Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> Manolis Tsamis writes: >> > +} >> > + >> > + virtual unsigned int execute (function *) override; >> > +}; // class pass_rtl_avoid_store_forwarding >> > + >> > +static unsigned int stats_sf_detected = 0; >

Re: [PATCH v5] Target-independent store forwarding avoidance.

2024-08-29 Thread Manolis Tsamis
Hi Richard, Thanks a lot for the extensive review and useful suggestions (and sorry for the late reply). I have implemented most of these for a next version, so let me address your individual comments below: On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 5:33 PM Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Manolis Tsamis writes: > >

Re: [PATCH v5] Target-independent store forwarding avoidance.

2024-08-16 Thread Richard Sandiford
Manolis Tsamis writes: > This pass detects cases of expensive store forwarding and tries to avoid them > by reordering the stores and using suitable bit insertion sequences. > For example it can transform this: > > strbw2, [x1, 1] > ldr x0, [x1] # Expensive store forwarding

Re: [PATCH v5] Target-independent store forwarding avoidance.

2024-08-11 Thread Jeff Law
On 8/9/24 8:58 AM, Manolis Tsamis wrote: This pass detects cases of expensive store forwarding and tries to avoid them by reordering the stores and using suitable bit insertion sequences. For example it can transform this: [ ... ] Trying to bootstrap (enabled by default) on 68k: ../../..