On Wed, 2022-08-03 at 10:59 +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote:
> I don't think mindlessly caring for vendor forks is always correct. In
> fact I find the name "movable" too generic, and something like
> "force_got_access" could be better.
The problem is "what will this behave *if* we later add some code
On 2022/8/3 09:36, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
Is it OK for trunk or I need to change something?
By the way, I'm seeking a possibility to include this into 12.2. Then
we leaves only 12.1 without this attribute, and we can just say
"building the kernel needs GCC 12.2 or later".
On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 18:07
Is it OK for trunk or I need to change something?
By the way, I'm seeking a possibility to include this into 12.2. Then
we leaves only 12.1 without this attribute, and we can just say
"building the kernel needs GCC 12.2 or later".
On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 18:07 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> Changes v4
