on 2019/6/17 下午9:44, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
>> on 2019/6/17 下午8:08, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On June 17, 2019 11:59:30 AM GMT+02:00, Segher Boessenkool
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> on 2019/6/17 下午8:08, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On June 17, 2019 11:59:30 AM GMT+02:00, Segher Boessenkool
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> >>>
> Hi Segher and
on 2019/6/17 下午8:08, Richard Biener wrote:
> On June 17, 2019 11:59:30 AM GMT+02:00, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>>>
Hi Segher and Bill,
Thanks a lot for your review comment
On June 17, 2019 11:59:30 AM GMT+02:00, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Segher and Bill,
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot for your review comments! I've updated the patch
>accordingly.
>> >
>>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
> > Hi Segher and Bill,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your review comments! I've updated the patch accordingly.
> >
> > The updated one attached.
>
> OK. I suppose all low-overhead loop instruc
on 2019/6/17 下午4:51, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
>> Hi Segher and Bill,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your review comments! I've updated the patch accordingly.
>>
>> The updated one attached.
>
> OK. I suppose all low-overhead loop instructions use a decrement to zer
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi Segher and Bill,
>
> Thanks a lot for your review comments! I've updated the patch accordingly.
>
> The updated one attached.
OK. I suppose all low-overhead loop instructions use a decrement to zero
style iterator?
Thanks,
Richard.
Hi Segher and Bill,
Thanks a lot for your review comments! I've updated the patch accordingly.
The updated one attached.
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
index 91fafc4e766..6667cd03042 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
@@
On 6/14/19 4:53 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Kewen,
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 01:50:05PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> Comparing with the previous version, I dropped the checks
>> on costly niter and invalid stmt scanning. As Richard's
>> suggestion, keep this as simple as possible, refine
Hi Kewen,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 01:50:05PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Comparing with the previous version, I dropped the checks
> on costly niter and invalid stmt scanning. As Richard's
> suggestion, keep this as simple as possible, refine it
> if finding any cases which matter later.
I think
10 matches
Mail list logo