On 12/23/2011 10:00 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Henderson writes:
>> On 12/22/2011 12:44 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> Woah, thanks, that's quite some work. OK for the patches I didn't
>>> respond to.
>>
>> Here's a combined follow-on patch that I believe addresses all of
>> the com
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 12/22/2011 12:44 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Woah, thanks, that's quite some work. OK for the patches I didn't
>> respond to.
>
> Here's a combined follow-on patch that I believe addresses all of
> the comments you had.
>
> Ok?
Yeah, looks good, thanks.
Richar
On 12/22/2011 12:44 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Woah, thanks, that's quite some work. OK for the patches I didn't
> respond to.
Here's a combined follow-on patch that I believe addresses all of
the comments you had.
Ok?
r~
commit 824b5ca31ea21bb02cedabf79bb98e4348c34366
Author: Richard Hend
Richard Henderson writes:
> The second patch you've seen before, updated with your comments.
>
> The rest came from trying to reduce the number of tests failing
> to be vectorized when compiling for Loongson. Eventually I just
> had to stop though; the result is still quite a few pattern match
>
