Jeff Law via Gcc-patches writes:
> On 4/18/23 07:02, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> "Victor L. Do Nascimento" writes:
>>> The function `constrain_operands' lacked the logic to consider relaxed
>>> memory constraints when "traditional" memory constraints were not
>>> satisfied, creati
On 4/18/23 07:02, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
"Victor L. Do Nascimento" writes:
The function `constrain_operands' lacked the logic to consider relaxed
memory constraints when "traditional" memory constraints were not
satisfied, creating potential issues as observed during the re
"Victor L. Do Nascimento" writes:
> The function `constrain_operands' lacked the logic to consider relaxed
> memory constraints when "traditional" memory constraints were not
> satisfied, creating potential issues as observed during the reload
> compilation pass.
>
> In addition, it was observed t
