On 12/12/2016 05:40 PM, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
@@ -15105,6 +15109,24 @@ If all of the enabled test conditions are false, t
The @code{scalar_test_neg} built-in functions return a non-zero value
if their @code{source} argument holds a negative value.
+The @code{__builtin_byte_in_set} function r
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 05:25:52PM -0700, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> Regarding the two test cases that are missing the scan-assembler
> directive (byte-in-set-1.c and byte-in-set-2.c), those tests are both
> expected to fail. They are checking that the compiler rejects those
> programs with appropriat
Thanks for your quick feedback.
I'll update the comments regarding possible future enhancement to
support QImode for operands[1] as well.
Regarding the two test cases that are missing the scan-assembler
directive (byte-in-set-1.c and byte-in-set-2.c), those tests are both
expected to fail. They
Hi Kelvin,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 05:40:05PM -0700, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> The patch has been bootstrapped and tested on
> powerpc64le-unknown-linux and powerpc-unknown-linux (big-endian, with
> both -m32 and -m64 target options) with no regressions.
>
> Is this ok for the trunk?
Yes it is, muc
