Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Add documentation about gengtype and inheritance

2013-10-24 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/23/13 21:00, David Malcolm wrote: I went through the various requirements listed in the doc and investigated what happens when they're violated. Some lead to immediate build failure in gengtype (which is relatively sane), but some lead to silent lack of field-traversal. The details: Yea,

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Add documentation about gengtype and inheritance

2013-10-23 Thread David Malcolm
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 12:49 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/24/13 11:49, David Malcolm wrote: > > gcc/ > > * doc/gty.texi (GTY Options): Add note about inheritance to > > description of desc and tag. > > (Inheritance and GTY): New. > So what happens if I have a class hierarchy without a

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Add documentation about gengtype and inheritance

2013-10-15 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/24/13 11:49, David Malcolm wrote: gcc/ * doc/gty.texi (GTY Options): Add note about inheritance to description of desc and tag. (Inheritance and GTY): New. So what happens if I have a class hierarchy without a gty-user marker which violates the assumptions made by y