On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> Haha, this is amazing! Will do. A newbish question: shall I send the updated
> patch "in reply" here, or should I resend the patchset?
Your choice, GCC doesn't have a hard rule for this. Personally I feel it's
more appropriate to send patches "i
On Чт, ноя 14, 2019 at 18:00, Alexander Monakov
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Alexander Monakov wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> I also named `dbgarg` as `debug_arg` because I figured I confuse
whether it
> was `gdbarg` or `gdbarg` :D
It should begin with a d
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
>
> > I also named `dbgarg` as `debug_arg` because I figured I confuse whether it
> > was `gdbarg` or `gdbarg` :D
>
> It should begin with a dollar ($debug_arg), otherwise GDB will attempt to
> loca
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> I also named `dbgarg` as `debug_arg` because I figured I confuse whether it
> was `gdbarg` or `gdbarg` :D
It should begin with a dollar ($debug_arg), otherwise GDB will attempt to locate
and use a variable named 'debug_arg' in the program being d
On Nov 14 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> python (I dunno, I can ‾\_(ツ)_/‾). The code:
Python support is optional.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
On Чт, ноя 14, 2019 at 16:57, Alexander Monakov
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
Though, this wouldn't be equivalent to what new people, who just
want to call
`debug()` with the arg, would expect :) If you want to deduplicate
the
function call, I can reorganize
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> Though, this wouldn't be equivalent to what new people, who just want to call
> `debug()` with the arg, would expect :) If you want to deduplicate the
> function call, I can reorganize the code to be like this:
>
> define pp
> if ($argc == 0)
>
On Чт, ноя 14, 2019 at 16:13, Alexander Monakov
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
Thanks! Unfortunately AFAIK ternary expressions are broken in gdb
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22466 :c
Indeed, I didn't notice that. But it still would be nice to
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> Thanks! Unfortunately AFAIK ternary expressions are broken in gdb
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22466 :c
Indeed, I didn't notice that. But it still would be nice to avoid duplicating
the commands over and over again. Can we us
On Чт, ноя 14, 2019 at 15:55, Alexander Monakov
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
Generally, people expect functions to accept arguments directly. But
ones defined in gdbinit did not use the argument, which may be
confusing
for newcomers. But we can't change behav
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> Generally, people expect functions to accept arguments directly. But
> ones defined in gdbinit did not use the argument, which may be confusing
> for newcomers. But we can't change behavior to use the argument without
> breaking existing users of
11 matches
Mail list logo
