n 5/29/23 11:26, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
Hi,
NightStrike writes:
Can you include texinfo in a top-level directory and have it built
with the build, like you can with dejagnu? That's generally a
decent path for building new gcc on older systems.
Note that the Texinfo requirement wasn't bumped
Hi,
NightStrike writes:
> Can you include texinfo in a top-level directory and have it built with the
> build, like you can with dejagnu? That's generally a decent path for
> building new gcc on older systems.
Note that the Texinfo requirement wasn't bumped, so nothing changed in
this regard, h
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023, 14:00 Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> > AFAIK we have not knowingly changed any specific requirements beyond the
> > stated 4.7 and 4.9 for PDF output, but it concerns me that nobody is
> > likely to be using versions that old on a regu
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 8:00 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>> > AFAIK we have not knowingly changed any specific requirements beyond the
>> > stated 4.7 and 4.9 for PDF output, but it concerns me that nobody is
>> > likely t
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 8:00 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> > AFAIK we have not knowingly changed any specific requirements beyond the
> > stated 4.7 and 4.9 for PDF output, but it concerns me that nobody is
> > likely to be using versions that old on a
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> AFAIK we have not knowingly changed any specific requirements beyond the
> stated 4.7 and 4.9 for PDF output, but it concerns me that nobody is
> likely to be using versions that old on a regular basis to make sure
> they continue to work and we hav
On 3/10/23 10:51, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 3/10/23 01:50, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi all,
On 9 Mar 2023, at 23:35, Sandra Loosemore via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 3/9/23 01:26, Richard Biener wrote:
SLES 12 has texinfo 4.13a, SLES 15 has texinfo 6.5. We still
provide up-to-date GCC for SLES 12 bu
On 3/10/23 01:50, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi all,
On 9 Mar 2023, at 23:35, Sandra Loosemore via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 3/9/23 01:26, Richard Biener wrote:
SLES 12 has texinfo 4.13a, SLES 15 has texinfo 6.5. We still
provide up-to-date GCC for SLES 12 but we can probably manage in
some ways when
Hi all,
> On 9 Mar 2023, at 23:35, Sandra Loosemore via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> On 3/9/23 01:26, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> SLES 12 has texinfo 4.13a, SLES 15 has texinfo 6.5. We still provide
>> up-to-date GCC for SLES 12 but we can probably manage in some ways
>> when the texinfo requireme
On 3/9/23 01:26, Richard Biener wrote:
SLES 12 has texinfo 4.13a, SLES 15 has texinfo 6.5. We still provide
up-to-date GCC for SLES 12 but we can probably manage in some ways
when the texinfo requirement gets bumped.
OK, this seems to be the oldest version anyone admits to actually using.
I
Sandra Loosemore writes:
>> As an example, let's take this link:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-12.2.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-Wpedantic
>> This should place you below the item line this index entry refers to,
>> and there aren't any copiable anchors (see equivalent in my render fo
On Wed, 8 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> I personally do not know how the manuals for the GCC web site are built
gcc.gnu.org has texinfo 6.5. (It's a RHEL 8.7 system.)
> If we do update the version, there's a version check in configure.ac and
> some hack for "makeinfo 4.7 brokenness" in doc
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 2:20 AM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 5:09 PM Sandra Loosemore
> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/8/23 14:22, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> > >
> > > Sandra Loosemore writes:
> > >
> > >> On 3/8/23 02:11, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> > >>> Sandra Loosemore wr
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 5:09 PM Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>
> On 3/8/23 14:22, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> >
> > Sandra Loosemore writes:
> >
> >> On 3/8/23 02:11, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> >>> Sandra Loosemore writes:
> >>>
> On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > I've r
On 3/8/23 14:22, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
Sandra Loosemore writes:
On 3/8/23 02:11, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
Sandra Loosemore writes:
On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote:
I've rerendered the updated documentation with latest development
Texinfo (as some of the changes I m
Sandra Loosemore writes:
> On 3/8/23 02:11, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
>> Sandra Loosemore writes:
>>
>>> On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote:
I've rerendered the updated documentation with latest development
Texinfo (as some of the changes I made for the purposes of
On 3/8/23 02:11, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
Sandra Loosemore writes:
On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote:
I've rerendered the updated documentation with latest development
Texinfo (as some of the changes I made for the purposes of the GCC
manual still aren't in releases) at:
Sandra Loosemore writes:
> On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> I've rerendered the updated documentation with latest development
>> Texinfo (as some of the changes I made for the purposes of the GCC
>> manual still aren't in releases) at:
>>https://www.aarsen.me/~arse
On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote:
I've rerendered the updated documentation with latest development
Texinfo (as some of the changes I made for the purposes of the GCC
manual still aren't in releases) at:
https://www.aarsen.me/~arsen/final/
Ummm. I don't think GCC's d
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Schwinge writes:
> Hi Arsen!
>
> Thanks for caring about the documentation infrastructure!
>
> On 2023-02-23T11:27:09+0100, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>> The commit "docs: Reorder @opindex to be before corresponding options"
>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermai
Hi Arsen!
Thanks for caring about the documentation infrastructure!
On 2023-02-23T11:27:09+0100, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> The commit "docs: Reorder @opindex to be before corresponding options"
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-February/612616.html
> His i
21 matches
Mail list logo
