Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] tree-object-size: Improved offset handling

2024-09-20 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar
On 2024-09-20 21:42, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: On 2024-09-20 20:20, Sam James wrote: Siddhesh Poyarekar writes: This series makes a few improvements to get static object size estimates in more cases, thus improving the success rate of the static __builtin_object_size.  This should fully fix

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] tree-object-size: Improved offset handling

2024-09-20 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar
On 2024-09-20 20:20, Sam James wrote: Siddhesh Poyarekar writes: This series makes a few improvements to get static object size estimates in more cases, thus improving the success rate of the static __builtin_object_size. This should fully fix PR116556 and also covers a bulk of use cases for

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] tree-object-size: Improved offset handling

2024-09-20 Thread Sam James
Siddhesh Poyarekar writes: > This series makes a few improvements to get static object size estimates in > more cases, thus improving the success rate of the static > __builtin_object_size. This should fully fix PR116556 and also covers a bulk > of use cases for PR77608. I started to try and fi