Re: [PATCH v2] libstdc++: Workaround for LLVM-61763 in ranges

2023-10-21 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 at 12:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 04:56, Benjamin Acker Brock wrote: > > > > > I don't think this patch counts as legally significant, but if you > > > contribute again in future you should be aware of > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#legal

Re: [PATCH v2] libstdc++: Workaround for LLVM-61763 in ranges

2023-10-21 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 04:56, Benjamin Acker Brock wrote: > > > I don't think this patch counts as legally significant, but if you > > contribute again in future you should be aware of > > https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#legal and either complete the copyright > > assignment paperwork, or a