On 7/24/17, Franz Sirl wrote:
> Am 2017-07-24 um 00:19 schrieb Volker Reichelt:
>> On 23 Jul, Eric Gallager wrote:
>>> On 7/23/17, Volker Reichelt wrote:
Hi again,
here is an updated patch for a new warning about redundant
access-specifiers. It takes Dave's various comments in
On 25 Jul, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 11:22:14PM +0200, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> [...]
>
> Not sure if the warning is too useful, but in any case...
>
>> + /* Emit warning. */
>> + gcc_rich_location richloc (token->location);
>> + richloc.add_fixit_remove ();
>> + if (col
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 11:22:14PM +0200, Volker Reichelt wrote:
[...]
Not sure if the warning is too useful, but in any case...
> + /* Emit warning. */
> + gcc_rich_location richloc (token->location);
> + richloc.add_fixit_remove ();
> + if (colon_token->type == CPP_COLON)
> +richloc.ad
Am 2017-07-24 um 00:19 schrieb Volker Reichelt:
On 23 Jul, Eric Gallager wrote:
On 7/23/17, Volker Reichelt wrote:
Hi again,
here is an updated patch for a new warning about redundant
access-specifiers. It takes Dave's various comments into account.
The main changes w.r.t. to the previous ve
On 23 Jul, Eric Gallager wrote:
> On 7/23/17, Volker Reichelt wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> here is an updated patch for a new warning about redundant
>> access-specifiers. It takes Dave's various comments into account.
>>
>> The main changes w.r.t. to the previous versions are:
>>
>> * The warning is
On 7/23/17, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> here is an updated patch for a new warning about redundant
> access-specifiers. It takes Dave's various comments into account.
>
> The main changes w.r.t. to the previous versions are:
>
> * The warning is now a two-level warning with a slightly s
