On 16-05-24 12:06:48, James Clarke wrote:
> Hi,
> > On 24 May 2016, at 11:59, Dhole wrote:
> >
> > Hey!
> >
> > I'm the original author of the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patch.
> >
> > I've just seen this. I believe that this bug was fixed in the the
> > rework of the patch I sent some days ago [1], al
Hi,
> On 24 May 2016, at 11:59, Dhole wrote:
>
> Hey!
>
> I'm the original author of the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patch.
>
> I've just seen this. I believe that this bug was fixed in the the
> rework of the patch I sent some days ago [1], although the latest
> version of that patch has not been revie
Hey!
I'm the original author of the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patch.
I've just seen this. I believe that this bug was fixed in the the
rework of the patch I sent some days ago [1], although the latest
version of that patch has not been reviewed yet. In [1] the
initialization of source_date_epoch is don