On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 4:07 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/20/20 3:37 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:57 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/19/20 3:46 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> OK, so can you send an updated patch?
> >
> > + tree pos_one = build_int_cst (
On 11/20/20 3:37 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:57 AM Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/19/20 3:46 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
OK, so can you send an updated patch?
+ tree pos_one = build_int_cst (type, 1);
+ if (!left->m_has_forward_bb
+ && !right->m_has_forwar
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:57 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/19/20 3:46 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > OK, so can you send an updated patch?
+ tree pos_one = build_int_cst (type, 1);
+ if (!left->m_has_forward_bb
+ && !right->m_has_forward_bb
+ && left->m_case_bb == righ
On 11/19/20 3:46 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
OK, so can you send an updated patch?
Sure.
Martin
>From 76e8424bd54d15fb3b2a2bdb4179fa8773500381 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:26:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add if-chain to switch conversion pass.
gcc/ChangeLo
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 1:25 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/16/20 1:21 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > but the most trivial thing would be to feed the pass the
> > balanced-tree generated by switch expansion where I
> > would expect us to be able to detect it as the original switch again.
>
> Well
On 11/16/20 1:21 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
but the most trivial thing would be to feed the pass the
balanced-tree generated by switch expansion where I
would expect us to be able to detect it as the original switch again.
Well, if we want to support such matching, then please deffer it to a pha
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:26 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/6/20 1:31 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 4:04 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> There's another version of the patch that should be based on what
> >> I discussed with Richi and Jakub:
> >>
> >> -
On 11/6/20 1:31 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 4:04 PM Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
There's another version of the patch that should be based on what
I discussed with Richi and Jakub:
- the first patch introduces a new option -fbit-tests that analogue to
-fjump-tables
a
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 4:04 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> There's another version of the patch that should be based on what
> I discussed with Richi and Jakub:
>
> - the first patch introduces a new option -fbit-tests that analogue to
> -fjump-tables
>and will control the new if-to-s
