Thanks Edwin, should be one silly mistake, will fix it ASAP.
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Edwin Lu
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 5:20 AM
To: Li, Pan2 ; Bernd Edlinger ;
Kito Cheng ; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Cc: gcc-patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Bugfix ICE for the vector return
On 4/11/2024 5:45 AM, Li, Pan2 wrote:
Thanks for reporting this. Just take a look from my test log that 930623-1.c is
all pass.
Thus I bet this difference comes from the build option --with-arch=rv32imac but
my test script take rv64gcv.
I've built the git revision f3fdcf4a37a with
../gcc-tru
: Thursday, April 11, 2024 7:52 PM
To: Li, Pan2 ; Kito Cheng ;
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Cc: gcc-patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Bugfix ICE for the vector return arg in mode
switch
On 4/11/24 05:03, Li, Pan2 wrote:
> Committed, thanks Juzhe and Kito.
>
> Pan
Hi Pan,
this commi
On 4/11/24 05:03, Li, Pan2 wrote:
> Committed, thanks Juzhe and Kito.
>
> Pan
Hi Pan,
this commit caused a regression:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/930623-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/930623-1.c -O1 (internal compiler error: in
emit_vec_extract, at config/
Committed, thanks Juzhe and Kito.
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Kito Cheng
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 10:50 AM
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Cc: Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Bugfix ICE for the vector return arg in mode
switch
I was thinking we may guarded
I was thinking we may guarded with TARGET_VECTOR and TARGET_HARD_FLOAT
or checking with ABI in riscv_function_value_regno_p, however I think
it's fine with current implementation (no checking) after checking all
use site of `targetm.calls.function_value_regno_p`, so LGTM :)
Thanks Pan for fixing t
Thanks for fixing it. LGTM from my side.
I prefer wait kito for another ACK.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: pan2.li
Date: 2024-04-11 10:16
To: gcc-patches
CC: juzhe.zhong; kito.cheng; Pan Li
Subject: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Bugfix ICE for the vector return arg in mode switch
From: Pan Li
This patch
