On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello Uroš,
> On 29 Sep 10:00, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> > + /* There is no vandnp[sd] in avx512f. Use vpandn[qd]. */
>> > + if (!TARGET_AVX512DQ)
>>
>> All other patterns also have " &&" condition here. Is
>> the above condition correct?
> I
Hello Uroš,
On 29 Sep 10:00, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > + /* There is no vandnp[sd] in avx512f. Use vpandn[qd]. */
> > + if (!TARGET_AVX512DQ)
>
> All other patterns also have " &&" condition here. Is
> the above condition correct?
I think this is correct since in this pattern we use AVX-512 only
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello,
> This patch extends andnot and any_logic insn
> patterns.
>
> Bootstrapped.
> AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
> under simulator.
>
> Is it ok for trunk?
>
> gcc/
> * config/i386/sse.md
> (define_insn "_andn
