On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Martin Liška
wrote:
> Hello,
>I prepared a collection of systemtap gr
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Martin Liška
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >I prepared a collection of systemtap graphs for GIMP.
>>> >
>>> > 1) just my profile-based function re
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >I prepared a collection of systemtap graphs for GIMP.
>> >
>> > 1) just my profile-based function reordering: 550 pages
>> > 2) just -freorder-blocks-and-partitions: 646
Thanks for the data. A few questions:
- Do you have the raw data used to generate your pdfs available? Since
you gave me the binaries, if I have the data in terms of exactly what
addresses are being plotted I can correlate with the specific cold
functions via nm. Once I know what cold functions ar
On 15 December 2013 23:17, Martin Liška wrote:
> Dear Jan and Teresa,
> Jan was right that I've been using changes which were commited by
> Teresa and do live in trunk. So the graph with time profile presented
> in my previous post was really with enabled
> -freorder-blocks-and-partition. I re
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > Hello,
> >I prepared a collection of systemtap graphs for GIMP.
> >
> > 1) just my profile-based function reordering: 550 pages
> > 2) just -freorder-blocks-and-partitions: 646 pages
> > 3) just -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partitions: 638
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > Hello,
> >I prepared a collection of systemtap graphs for GIMP.
> >
> > 1) just my profile-based function reordering: 550 pages
> > 2) just -freorder-blocks-and-partitions: 646 pages
> > 3) just -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partitions: 638
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello,
>I prepared a collection of systemtap graphs for GIMP.
>
> 1) just my profile-based function reordering: 550 pages
> 2) just -freorder-blocks-and-partitions: 646 pages
> 3) just -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partitions: 638 pages
>
> Plea
Dear Teresa,
I will today double check if the graphs are correct :)
Martin
On 2 December 2013 17:16, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 12/02/13 08:16, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm wondering if the -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition graph really
>> had that disabled. I am surprised that the size of th
On 12/02/13 08:16, Teresa Johnson wrote:
I'm wondering if the -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition graph really
had that disabled. I am surprised that the size of the .text and
.text.hot did not shrink from splitting.
Could be due to needing longer jump opcodes to reach the unlikely sections.
jeff
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Dear Teresa and Jan,
>>I tried to test Teresa's patch, but I've encountered two bugs
>> during usage of -fprofile-generate/use (one in SPEC CPU 2006 and
>> Inkscape).
>
> Thanks, this is non-LTO run. Is there a chance to get -flto version,
> Dear Teresa and Jan,
>I tried to test Teresa's patch, but I've encountered two bugs
> during usage of -fprofile-generate/use (one in SPEC CPU 2006 and
> Inkscape).
Thanks, this is non-LTO run. Is there a chance to get -flto version, too?
So we see how things combine with -freorder-function
>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/19/13 10:24, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>>
>>> Martin,
>>> can you, please, generate the updated systemtap with
>>> -freorder-blocks-and-partition enabled?
>>>
>>> I am in favour of enab
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Teresa Johnson writes:
>
>> This patch enables -freorder-blocks-and-partition by default for x86
>> at -O2 and up. It is showing some modest gains in cpu2006 performance
>> with profile feedback and -O2 on an Intel Westmere system. Specifically
Teresa Johnson writes:
> This patch enables -freorder-blocks-and-partition by default for x86
> at -O2 and up. It is showing some modest gains in cpu2006 performance
> with profile feedback and -O2 on an Intel Westmere system. Specifically,
> I am seeing consistent improvements in 401.bzip2 (1.5-
On 11/19/13 10:24, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Martin,
can you, please, generate the updated systemtap with
-freorder-blocks-and-partition enabled?
I am in favour of enabling this - it is usefull pass and it is pointless ot
have passes that are not
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Martin,
> can you, please, generate the updated systemtap with
> -freorder-blocks-and-partition enabled?
>
> I am in favour of enabling this - it is usefull pass and it is pointless ot
> have passes that are not enabled by default.
> Is there r
Martin,
can you, please, generate the updated systemtap with
-freorder-blocks-and-partition enabled?
I am in favour of enabling this - it is usefull pass and it is pointless ot
have passes that are not enabled by default.
Is there reason why this would not work on other ELF target? Is it working
w
18 matches
Mail list logo
