> I think removing the is_inorder attribute should be ok. I added it
> because I wanted to avoid having two matching insn reservations
> defined since matching solely on the type attribute should also match
> on all subsets as well (i.e. if eventually we add an insn reservation
> checking for type
On 1/25/2024 9:06 AM, Robin Dapp wrote:
Thanks, that looks better IMHO.
+;; Copyright (C) 2011-2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+;; Contributed by Andrew Waterman (and...@sifive.com).
+;; Based on MIPS target for GNU compiler.
You might want to change that, as well as the date. While at
Thanks, that looks better IMHO.
> +;; Copyright (C) 2011-2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +;; Contributed by Andrew Waterman (and...@sifive.com).
> +;; Based on MIPS target for GNU compiler.
You might want to change that, as well as the date. While at
it you can also fix the broken date in
