Thanks, this is the updated patch I'm going to check in.
Uros Bizjak 于2023年7月4日周二 16:57写道：
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 10:32 AM Hongyu Wang wrote:
> >
> > > In a follow-up patch, can you please document inlining rules involving
> > > -march and -mtune to "x86 Function Attributes" section? Current
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 10:32 AM Hongyu Wang wrote:
>
> > In a follow-up patch, can you please document inlining rules involving
> > -march and -mtune to "x86 Function Attributes" section? Currently, the
> > inlining rules at the end of "target function attribute" section does
> > not even mention
> In a follow-up patch, can you please document inlining rules involving
> -march and -mtune to "x86 Function Attributes" section? Currently, the
> inlining rules at the end of "target function attribute" section does
> not even mention -march and -mtune. Maybe a subsubsection "Inlining
> rules" sh
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 5:12 AM Hongyu Wang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For function with different target attributes, current logic rejects to
> inline the callee when any arch or tune is mismatched. Relax the
> condition to allow callee with default arch/tune to be inlined.
>
> Boostrapped/regtested on x8
