Re: [PATCH V1] HIGH part of symbol ref is invalid for constant pool

Segher Boessenkool writes: Thanks a lot for your review! > Hi! > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 10:30:54PM +0800, Jiufu Guo wrote: >> In patch https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-July/597712.html, >> test case was not added. After more check, a testcase is added for it. >> >> The high pa

Re: [PATCH V1] HIGH part of symbol ref is invalid for constant pool

Hi! On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 10:30:54PM +0800, Jiufu Guo wrote: > In patch https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-July/597712.html, > test case was not added. After more check, a testcase is added for it. > > The high part of the symbol address is invalid for the constant pool. Invalid,

Re: [PATCH V1] HIGH part of symbol ref is invalid for constant pool

"Kewen.Lin" writes: > Hi Jeff, > > on 2022/7/19 22:30, Jiufu Guo wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In patch https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-July/597712.html, >> test case was not added. After more check, a testcase is added for it. >> > > Good to see that you constructed one actual test case,

Re: [PATCH V1] HIGH part of symbol ref is invalid for constant pool

Hi Jeff, on 2022/7/19 22:30, Jiufu Guo wrote: > Hi, > > In patch https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-July/597712.html, > test case was not added. After more check, a testcase is added for it. > Good to see that you constructed one actual test case, nice! :) > The high part of the