On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 12:24:54AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 11/27/24 11:17 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 11/27/24 1:43 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 12:03:23AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
> > > >
> > > > Does this approach ma
On 11/27/24 11:17 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/27/24 1:43 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 12:03:23AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Does this approach make sense to you? Any other ideas?
-- 8< --
We weren't representing 'using namespace' at all
On 11/27/24 1:43 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 12:03:23AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Does this approach make sense to you? Any other ideas?
-- 8< --
We weren't representing 'using namespace' at all in modules, which broke
some of the literal
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 12:03:23AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> Does this approach make sense to you? Any other ideas?
>
> -- 8< --
>
> We weren't representing 'using namespace' at all in modules, which broke
> some of the literals tests.
>
> I experimented wi
