On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:17 PM Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 11:10, bin.cheng wrote:
> >
> > --
> > Sender:Richard Biener
> > Sent at:2018 Nov 13 (Tue) 23:03
> > To:bin.cheng
> > Cc:GCC Patches
> > Subject:Re:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 11:10, bin.cheng wrote:
>
> --
> Sender:Richard Biener
> Sent at:2018 Nov 13 (Tue) 23:03
> To:bin.cheng
> Cc:GCC Patches
> Subject:Re: [PATCH PR84648]Adjust loop exit conditions for loop-until-wrap
> cases.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:09 AM bin.cheng wrote:
>
> --
> Sender:Richard Biener
> Sent at:2018 Nov 13 (Tue) 23:03
> To:bin.cheng
> Cc:GCC Patches
> Subject:Re: [PATCH PR84648]Adjust loop exit conditions for loop-until-wrap
> case
--
Sender:Richard Biener
Sent at:2018 Nov 13 (Tue) 23:03
To:bin.cheng
Cc:GCC Patches
Subject:Re: [PATCH PR84648]Adjust loop exit conditions for loop-until-wrap
cases.
>
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 9:02 AM bin.cheng wrote:
>>
>> Hi
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 9:02 AM bin.cheng wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This patch fixes PR84648 by adjusting exit conditions for loop-until-wrap
> cases.
> It only handles simple cases in which IV.base are constants because we rely on
> current niter analyzer which doesn't handle parameterized bound in wrapp
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 7:20 PM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 16:02:33 +0800
> "bin.cheng" wrote:
>
> Quick observation unrelated to the real patch.
>
> I think the coding style mandates to use the type itself and not the
> underlying structure.
>
> I know there are alot
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 16:02:33 +0800
"bin.cheng" wrote:
Quick observation unrelated to the real patch.
I think the coding style mandates to use the type itself and not the
underlying structure.
I know there are alot of places from before our switch to C++ that
still use enum tree_code or enum mac
