Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 1:56 AM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Based on the "complete unrolling" view, if we number statements as
>> (i, n), where i is the outer loop iteration and n is a statement number
>> in the (completely unrolled) loop body, then the original scalar
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 1:56 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 7:12 AM Bin.Cheng wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:24 PM Richard Biener
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:37 PM Richard Biener
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 8:56 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 7:12 AM Bin.Cheng wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:24 PM Richard Biener
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:37 PM Richard Biener
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >>
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 7:12 AM Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:24 PM Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:37 PM Richard Biener
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> > > > On Fri, Dec 15,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 7:12 AM Bin.Cheng wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:24 PM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:37 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Richard Biener
>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:24 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:37 PM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Richard Biener
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:37 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On F
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
where *unroll is similar to *max_vf I think. dist_v[0] is the
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>>> where *unroll is similar to *max_vf I think. dist_v[0] is the innermost
>>> loop.
>>
>> [0] is always outermost loop.
>>
>>> T
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> where *unroll is similar to *max_vf I think. dist_v[0] is the innermost
>> loop.
>
> [0] is always outermost loop.
>
>> The vectorizer does way more complicated things and only looks at
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> where *unroll is similar to *max_vf I think. dist_v[0] is the innermost loop.
[0] is always outermost loop.
> The vectorizer does way more complicated things and only looks at the
> distance with respect to the outer loop as far as I can see wh
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, De
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fr
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
>>>
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
As explained in the PR, given below test case:
int a[8][
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> As explained in the PR, given below test case:
>>> int a[8][10] = { [2][5] = 4 }, c;
>>>
>>> int
>>> main ()
>>> {
>>>
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> As explained in the PR, given below test case:
>> int a[8][10] = { [2][5] = 4 }, c;
>>
>> int
>> main ()
>> {
>> short b;
>> int i, d;
>> for (b = 4; b >= 0; b--)
>> fo
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> As explained in the PR, given below test case:
> int a[8][10] = { [2][5] = 4 }, c;
>
> int
> main ()
> {
> short b;
> int i, d;
> for (b = 4; b >= 0; b--)
> for (c = 0; c <= 6; c++)
> a[c + 1][b + 2] = a[c][b + 1];
> for
18 matches
Mail list logo
