Re: [PATCH PING] boehm-gc: check for execinfo.h directly

2016-06-22 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 21 Jun 2016 21:10, Jeff Law wrote: > On 06/21/2016 06:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 21 Jun 2016 15:46, Jeff Law wrote: > > > >> If accepted into upstream Boehm-GC, then this is obviously acceptable in > >> GCC's copy. > > > > so changes can be pushed directly if it's already in upstream ?

Re: [PATCH PING] boehm-gc: check for execinfo.h directly

2016-06-21 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/21/2016 06:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On 21 Jun 2016 15:46, Jeff Law wrote: If accepted into upstream Boehm-GC, then this is obviously acceptable in GCC's copy. so changes can be pushed directly if it's already in upstream ? my original goal is already fixed in upstream, but it's not

Re: [PATCH PING] boehm-gc: check for execinfo.h directly

2016-06-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 21 Jun 2016 15:46, Jeff Law wrote: > On 06/13/2016 11:40 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > The current header depends on glibc version checks to determine whether > > execinfo.h exists which breaks uClibc. Instead, add an explicit configure > > check for it. > > > > 2015-08-29 Mike Frysinger > >

Re: [PATCH PING] boehm-gc: check for execinfo.h directly

2016-06-21 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/13/2016 11:40 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: The current header depends on glibc version checks to determine whether execinfo.h exists which breaks uClibc. Instead, add an explicit configure check for it. 2015-08-29 Mike Frysinger * configure.ac: Call AC_CHECK_HEADERS([execinfo.h])