On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This is a followup patch to PR81388's fix. According to Richi,
>> POINTER_TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED was added in -fstrict-overflow
>> warning work. Given:
>> A) strict-overflow
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> This is a followup patch to PR81388's fix. According to Richi,
> POINTER_TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED was added in -fstrict-overflow
> warning work. Given:
> A) strict-overflow was removed;
> B) memory object can not wrap in address space