> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 2:27 AM
> To: Bin Cheng
> Cc: 'Jakub Jelinek'; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Fix test case failure reported in PR54989
>
> On 10
On 10/26/2012 10:14 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Actually I am going to submit a patch monitoring the change of register
pressure accurately as we discussed before. With that patch, expressions
will be hoisted anyway if it can decrease register pressure thus this test
case won't fail anymore. So I am won
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 2:54 AM
> To: Bin Cheng
> Cc: 'Jakub Jelinek'; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Fix test case failure reported in PR54989
>
> On 10
On 10/22/2012 02:15 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 3:16 PM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Fix test case failure reported in PR54989
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:00
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 3:16 PM
> To: Bin Cheng
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Fix test case failure reported in PR54989
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:00:08A
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:00:08AM +0800, Bin Cheng wrote:
> The test case "gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure.c" is failed on
> x86_64-apple-darwin because it uses more registers than x86_64-linux. This
> can be fixed by simplifying the case using fewer registers.
>
> Tested on x86_64-
